Dilbrt wrote: Yes, I'm well aware that spellsurge futions perftly regardless of the ehants other people have. In a strtomparison of healing over time, 81 healing provides greater healing done than the mana
you get from the casional spellsurge. Now if you have 2-3+ other people in your group with spellsurge, the effieyhanges to the point where you end up healing more with multle spellsurges, than you get with 81 healing. But sie having the +81 healing ehant doesn't elude you from benefitting from the 2-3+ other people's spellsurge ehants, you have to take their ehants intoonsideration whenaulating the effts of +81 vs spellsurge. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying everyone should go for the +81 healing. For the OP, who'sonsidering getting rid of hisurrent me that has 11 mp5 and getting one with none, I still think spellsurge is worth it.
Leodis wrote:But sie having the +81 healing ehant doesn't elude you from benefitting from the 2-3+ other people's spellsurge ehants, you have to take their ehants intoonsideration whenaulating the effts of +81 vs spellsurge. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying everyone should go for the +81 healing. For the OP, who'sonsidering getting rid of hisurrent me that has 11 mp5 and getting one with none, I still think spellsurge is worth it. True enough, but one should think of the group benefit if you've already got multle healers with Spellsurge and you add another. It's kinda selfish not to.
I'll be setting up an arena team with two friends of my, a warrior and a druid.
Thease here is that I will be Ret, he warrior MS and our Druid Resto. I've heared and seen that Ret pally's in arena's should team up with Enhaement shamans, we'll be looking for one to swap either our warrior or me with sometimes. But anyway if you look at our arena setup without the Shaman, would a WarriorDruidPaladin have ahae? ,Zignaestos
